<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Porous Nature of Thought</title>
	<atom:link href="http://glitteringstew.com/muse/2007/12/13/the-porous-nature-of-thought/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://glitteringstew.com/muse/2007/12/13/the-porous-nature-of-thought/</link>
	<description>Unbearable Lightness. Humanist Spirituality. Balanced Living. Poetic Inspiration.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 02:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Noel Kingsley</title>
		<link>http://glitteringstew.com/muse/2007/12/13/the-porous-nature-of-thought/#comment-51690</link>
		<dc:creator>Noel Kingsley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glitteringstew.com/muse/2007/12/13/the-porous-nature-of-thought/#comment-51690</guid>
		<description>Great post, Garnet. And thanks Betty for some helpful comments. Noel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Garnet. And thanks Betty for some helpful comments. Noel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale</title>
		<link>http://glitteringstew.com/muse/2007/12/13/the-porous-nature-of-thought/#comment-50130</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 15:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glitteringstew.com/muse/2007/12/13/the-porous-nature-of-thought/#comment-50130</guid>
		<description>Garnet, I just wanted to let you know this post is now included in Humanist Symposium #13, here: 

http://danceswithanxiety.blogspot.com/2008/01/humanist-symposium-13-cheesy-holiday.html

Thanks! - Dale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Garnet, I just wanted to let you know this post is now included in Humanist Symposium #13, here: </p>
<p><a href="http://danceswithanxiety.blogspot.com/2008/01/humanist-symposium-13-cheesy-holiday.html" rel="nofollow">http://danceswithanxiety.blogspot.com/2008/01/humanist-symposium-13-cheesy-holiday.html</a></p>
<p>Thanks! - Dale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garnet David</title>
		<link>http://glitteringstew.com/muse/2007/12/13/the-porous-nature-of-thought/#comment-47522</link>
		<dc:creator>Garnet David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 00:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glitteringstew.com/muse/2007/12/13/the-porous-nature-of-thought/#comment-47522</guid>
		<description>betty- I'm sure you would agree that conscious awareness of one's present situation can intercept the stimulation of the nervous response. And that lack of same consciousness will allow unnecesssary stimulation by the imagination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>betty- I&#8217;m sure you would agree that conscious awareness of one&#8217;s present situation can intercept the stimulation of the nervous response. And that lack of same consciousness will allow unnecesssary stimulation by the imagination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: betty</title>
		<link>http://glitteringstew.com/muse/2007/12/13/the-porous-nature-of-thought/#comment-47496</link>
		<dc:creator>betty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glitteringstew.com/muse/2007/12/13/the-porous-nature-of-thought/#comment-47496</guid>
		<description>It's a scientific fact that your nervous system cannot tell the difference between an imagined experience and a "real" experience.  There are books written on this subject, many under the heading "psycho-cybernetics" which is a technique for using your subconscious power.  Thank you for reminding me of those books which I read a few years ago and benefitted from.  There are many paths to the same goal.

Hugs,
Betty</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a scientific fact that your nervous system cannot tell the difference between an imagined experience and a &#8220;real&#8221; experience.  There are books written on this subject, many under the heading &#8220;psycho-cybernetics&#8221; which is a technique for using your subconscious power.  Thank you for reminding me of those books which I read a few years ago and benefitted from.  There are many paths to the same goal.</p>
<p>Hugs,<br />
Betty</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garnet David</title>
		<link>http://glitteringstew.com/muse/2007/12/13/the-porous-nature-of-thought/#comment-47224</link>
		<dc:creator>Garnet David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 23:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glitteringstew.com/muse/2007/12/13/the-porous-nature-of-thought/#comment-47224</guid>
		<description>Brad- Interesting Perls quote. I often think of falling into the abyss to find my ground. I checked Perls out on Wiki and found his "Gestalt Prayer". Sums up modern individualism.

    I do my thing and you do your thing.
    I am not in this world to live up to your expectations,
    And you are not in this world to live up to mine.
    You are you, and I am I, and if by chance we find each other, it's beautiful.                  
    If not, it can't be helped. 

I like your idea of thought being a receptor of larger ideas of group consciousness. But as you imply, the problem is prejudice and other inhibitors to a clear "signal". 

Thanks for your always intriguing thoughts.

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad- Interesting Perls quote. I often think of falling into the abyss to find my ground. I checked Perls out on Wiki and found his &#8220;Gestalt Prayer&#8221;. Sums up modern individualism.</p>
<p>    I do my thing and you do your thing.<br />
    I am not in this world to live up to your expectations,<br />
    And you are not in this world to live up to mine.<br />
    You are you, and I am I, and if by chance we find each other, it&#8217;s beautiful.<br />
    If not, it can&#8217;t be helped. </p>
<p>I like your idea of thought being a receptor of larger ideas of group consciousness. But as you imply, the problem is prejudice and other inhibitors to a clear &#8220;signal&#8221;. </p>
<p>Thanks for your always intriguing thoughts.</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
