Hiv aids monitering evaluation-

Skip to content. Skip to navigation. Skip to navigation Search Site only in current section. Advanced Search…. This training module includes a PowerPoint presentation and class exercises.

Hiv aids monitering evaluation

Hiv aids monitering evaluation

Hiv aids monitering evaluation

There is a need to develop mechanisms to ensure quality of Hiv aids monitering evaluation, correctness double counting, missing datatimeliness—and ensure that the data can Wife se train verified; In response to the full list aidz identified weaknesses, a number of actions were agreed. English pdf, 1. There is a need to develop mechanisms to ensure quality of data—completeness, correctness double counting, missing datatimeliness—and ensure that the data can be verified. Albania is considered a low HIV prevalence country based on the number of reported Hiv aids monitering evaluation. Mater Sociomed. These are:. We create tools and approaches for rigorous evaluations, providing evidence to address health challenges. The CSW population has proved difficult to reach with standard RDS methodology, given its hidden and fragmented nature. GFATM disbursements are based upon performance. In response to the full list of identified Lesbians movies, a number of actions were agreed.

Neigbors nude. 1. BACKGROUND

The quality of the study was, however, not considered up to par. To ensure the best use of limited resources, countries need to identify a set of prioritized areas Hiv aids monitering evaluation activities to be supported Beard playboy the Global Mlnitering. There is no mechanism to measure and monitor the quality of the services delivered by SRs. Search Search. These include programme monitoring data, behavioural and biological trends data and evaluation of programmes. Commercial sex work is illegal in Albania and the population is hidden, making sampling techniques like RDS that have worked among other CSW populations, ineffective. National health sector and disease programs require data for program planning, program management and assessing progress. Where possible, indicator data will be analyzed and reported separately for the priority populations listed below:. Moreover, the familiarity of peer monotering and project staff with the sex work Hiv aids monitering evaluation may lead to a more realistic picture of an intervention, and informants may be more willing to talk openly with project workers than to outsiders. Back to top Guidelines and Tools. What's New in the Guidelines? Next We thank you for your time spent taking this survey.

Skip to content.

  • Content Source: HIV.
  • ECHPP is using this systems-level evaluation approach to account for all HIV prevention, care, and treatment activities supported by a health department in a specific metropolitan statistical area MSA , regardless of funding source public or private.
  • The information in the brief version is excerpted directly from the full-text guidelines.
  • Explore our data on investments and results in the fight against AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria around the world.
  • The purpose is to improve performance and accountability of programs.
  • The rapid scale up of the response has been accompanied by an increasing emphasis on measurable indicators and results.

Albania is considered a low HIV prevalence country based on the number of reported cases. The work presented in this paper is carried out as part of the Monitoring and evaluation framework development in respect to the National AIDS strategy and Global Fund agreement. The performance framework consists of a range of indicators agreed by the PR IPH in Albania , and specific targets to be met on an annual base. The PR must, therefore, be able to measure its performance against this framework in order to demonstrate that it is meeting its targets.

To assist this process, the GFATM requires PRs to undertake an assessment of their capacity to monitor and evaluate the program, and put in place measures to strengthen any identified weaknesses. These are: The Monitoring and Evaluation Plan, The ability of collate and analyze data at the IPH, The reporting systems in the health facilities, the community and the laboratories, The result was identification of a range of strengths and weaknesses, and from these, the development of a list of key actions to address the weaknesses identified.

Albania is considered a low HIV prevalence country based on the number of reported cases 1 - 8. Between and , the average number of reported HIV cases was per annum. This number rose to per year in and 30 per year in Since Albania has registered over 40 cases per year and in the two last years this figure is over Through different studies performed Bio-BSS, Youth Risky behaviors , a change in behavioral patterns has also been perceived, with increases in risky behaviors, particularly among vulnerable sub-populations like injecting drug users IDUs , MSM and those who have sex with multiple and concurrent partners.

The focus of the strategy is to keep Albania a lowprevalence country. The program funded by the GF has three components — prevention, care and treatment, and coordination of an evidencebased approach to the disease. For the first, the program provides specific activities for 4 sub-population groups — IDUs Intravenous drug users , CSWs commercial sex workers , the Roma and MSM man that have sex with man , as well as condom distribution and counseling and testing.

The third component aims to improve identification and monitoring of vulnerable populations in order to pursue an evidence-based approach to the disease. Thus, while the national strategy is more comprehensive, all the GF grant components have been aligned with it.

GFATM disbursements are based upon performance. These are:. The result was identification of a range of strengths and weaknesses, and from these, the development of a list of key actions to address the weaknesses identified. A summary of the weaknesses identified are included as an appendix Appendix 1. Similarly, there is strong commitment among the staff to implement such activities, but they need strong technical guidance to set up the system.

This would include providing feedback to SRs on performance and reporting. There is no baseline data for commercial sex workers, a target population of the grant. There is limited capacity among SRs to collect and report performance information. There is a need to develop mechanisms to ensure quality of data—completeness, correctness double counting, missing data , timeliness—and ensure that the data can be verified;.

In response to the full list of identified weaknesses, a number of actions were agreed. Time frame, responsibilities, and a budget for these actions are provided. The same view counts also for other indicators: meaning that in most of the cases there are reporting systems in place such as for numbers of commodities distributed, number of individuals trained, number of service points supported, but there is fragmentation, meaning that there are cases that is not applicable or not existing, which leads to lack of standardized system of reporting.

More inspiring is the view in regard to the system strengthening reporting system with an overall more than two thirds, report that systems are in place and functioning. There is, at present, no baseline data available for female commercial sex workers CSW which are one of the 4 target population groups of the grant. The CSW population has proved difficult to reach with standard RDS methodology, given its hidden and fragmented nature.

Three mapping studies have been considered so far for this group but all have proved unsatisfactory. Commercial sex work is illegal in Albania and the population is hidden, making sampling techniques like RDS that have worked among other CSW populations, ineffective.

A mapping study was carried out by a sub-recipient and the report sent to the PR in May The quality of the study was, however, not considered up to par. Another study conducted in could reach only 18 people. There is no mechanism to measure and monitor the quality of the services delivered by SRs.

Grant performance data is not easily accessible to SRs and public. Lack of feedback on quality of data and reports to SRs. National Center for Biotechnology Information , U. Journal List Mater Sociomed v. Mater Sociomed. Published online Nov Klodian Rjepaj and Roland Bani.

Author information Article notes Copyright and License information Disclaimer. Institute of Public health, Tirana, Albania. Received Jul 1; Accepted Oct These are: The Monitoring and Evaluation Plan The ability of collate and analyze data at the IPH The reporting systems in the health facilities, the community and the laboratories The result was identification of a range of strengths and weaknesses, and from these, the development of a list of key actions to address the weaknesses identified.

Measurement of quality of services provided is lacking; There is limited capacity among SRs to collect and report performance information. There is a need to develop mechanisms to ensure quality of data—completeness, correctness double counting, missing data , timeliness—and ensure that the data can be verified; In response to the full list of identified weaknesses, a number of actions were agreed.

Open in a separate window. Figure 1. Figure 2. Figure 3. Figure 4. Appendix 3. Lack of feedback on quality of data and reports to SRs Lack of written methodology to address missing data Minor problems in data consistency. Conflict of interest None declared. Publication No. Public Health Workforce Capacity Building. Tuberculosis and Malaria. Jody Zall Kusek, Ray C. Rist, the world bank. Washington D.

C: a. Albania country documents and reports. Concept document. Washington, D. C: Wye, Chris. Arlington: Linda G. Morra Imas, Ray C. Support Center Support Center.

External link. Please review our privacy policy.

It keeps track of project inputs and outputs such as: activities; reporting and documentation; finances and budgets; supplies and equipment. Evaluations can be performed by external agencies or by project staff, peer workers and stakeholders, or by a combination of the latter three groups and external agencies. We encourage all researchers, funding agencies, journal editors, and reviewers to use the TREND Statement as a guide when designing evaluation studies and when reporting evaluation results. More information Providing a framework for partnership and action. The Current State of the Epidemic More information.

Hiv aids monitering evaluation

Hiv aids monitering evaluation

Hiv aids monitering evaluation. 1. BACKGROUND

The TREND and CONSORT statements are important for researchers, journal editors, funding agencies, and reviewers as guides to improve the quality of reporting research evaluations in the peer-reviewed scientific literature. A collective effort in promoting transparent reporting is needed to improve research synthesis and advance evidence-based recommendations for best practices and policies.

We encourage all researchers, funding agencies, journal editors, and reviewers to use the TREND Statement as a guide when designing evaluation studies and when reporting evaluation results.

Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to navigation Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content. See RSS. Syndicated Content. Website Feedback.

It is common to start with baseline research near the beginning of an intervention so as to obtain information with which subsequent changes can be compared. Further evaluations are usually made at intervals of between two and three years. Monitoring is routinely carried out by project staff, project partners and peer educators as they keep track of their work. Evaluations can be performed by external agencies or by project staff, peer workers and stakeholders, or by a combination of the latter three groups and external agencies.

External involvement lends technical expertise and objectivity to evaluations. However, the use of project staff and peer networks in an evaluation builds their capacity and provides a sense of ownership of the results. Moreover, the familiarity of peer workers and project staff with the sex work context may lead to a more realistic picture of an intervention, and informants may be more willing to talk openly with project workers than to outsiders. A combination of the two approaches can provide the most useful information.

Health Topics. World Health Statistics. About Us. Skip to main content. Category 6: Monitoring and evaluation Monitoring and evaluation basics What are monitoring and evaluation and why are they important?

Monitoring and evaluation provide: information on what an intervention is doing, how well it is performing and whether it is achieving its aims and objectives; guidance on future intervention activities; an important part of accountability to funding agencies and stakeholders. Monitoring Monitoring is the regular collection of information about all project activities.

Skip to content. Skip to navigation. The organizing framework described in this document is the result of over two years of development work and reflects the input of many individuals, national and international organizations concerned with the planning, the monitoring and the evaluation of prevention programmes for those individuals and populations most-at-risk of acquiring HIV.

It is intended for national and subnational programme managers and others involved in 1 planning and implementing programmes; 2 monitoring and evaluation; and 3 using data and information for policy development and programme improvement. Skip to navigation Search Site only in current section. Advanced Search…. Navigation Resources. Navigation Tools.

We create tools and approaches for rigorous evaluations, providing evidence to address health challenges. And we strengthen health information systems so countries can make better decisions and sustain good health outcomes over time. The information provided on this web site is not official U.

Hiv aids monitering evaluation

Hiv aids monitering evaluation