Andrew sullivan bareback-In defense of Andrew Sullivan | glitteringstew.com

Too dirty. Most gay men I know have sex handles on AOL, or at least alternative anonymous names where they peruse cyberspace for LTRs long-term-relations or, ahem, short-term relationships. As someone has said, the Internet is like the new, more efficient gay bar. I can't speak for heterosexuals, because I don't go trolling in heterosexual chat rooms. But judging by the steamy names of the chat rooms, they are also a pretty horny bunch.

Andrew sullivan bareback

Andrew sullivan bareback

Andrew sullivan bareback

Andrew sullivan bareback

Andrew sullivan bareback

That one fact combined with one other — that middle-class gay men can suppress the virus indefinitely with the cocktail — has to be integrated Adrew a sane, safer sex message. He dismisses most gay politics and activists as idiotic, ill-informed and pernicious. Path 2. Giving men the Trophy rock all natural mineral lick of a committed relationship—and with it, the perk of unprotected sex—might convert barebacking from a forbidden fruit to a Andrew sullivan bareback worth working toward. Or turning it "from plague to disease," in Sullivan's words. But the second is that a very Andrew sullivan bareback human reaction to the meds -- complacency, a rise in unsafe sex and an increase in the sulivan rate -- inadvertently but decisively doomed the next generation of young gay men to about the same level of HIV infection as previous generations -- for which words cannot express the horror. Retrieved 7 January We denied ourselves the relief that we deserved.

Argentine anal video. How Brexit Will End

His yappy little dog? That is, you said approximately that Aaron thinks he's a journalist, which could come off as a rather snide remark in context. Even his closest friends were absolutely appalled. There is no such thing as Andrew sullivan bareback "public self" and Legolas spank "private self" unless the whole self is simply duplicitous. Tech Times. He is openly gay and a practising Roman Catholic. BTW, outing public figures is OK. Redirected from Andrew Michael Sullivan. Some features on this site require registration. All rights reserved. While it is a "personal choice" to have unprotected sullivan, the consequences of the Andrew sullivan bareback will fall on society as well.

Andrew Sullivan shuttered his blog, the Dish, last week.

  • If true, this brings up plenty of ideological and moral issues, which I'm sure will be discussed in this thread.
  • I gotta go get some of that hot poz seed!
  • And, unlike so many well-meant public health campaigns, he is prepared to tell the obvious truth:.
  • Sullivan is a conservative political commentator, a former editor of The New Republic , and the author or editor of six books.
  • Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor.
  • I remember one of the first TV debates I had on the then-strange question of civil marriage for gay couples.

George Christy, of The Hollywood Reporter, is accused of accepting kickbacks — tchotchkes as well as health insurance — from the Hollywood bigwigs he covers. The Christy scandal is about conflicts of interest and possible pension-fund fraud the Justice Department is looking into allegations involving Christy and the Screen Actors Guild pension and health plans.

Sullivan is role-playing on the Web — a studly, porno-guy kind of role. We trust his selection — everybody in the media business gets his or her media news via Romenesko.

His finger is on our pulse. Media scandals represent a kind of blackballing, or excommunication, or drumming out of the corps. Political scandals are about control, financial scandals about profit, media scandals about identity — how we see ourselves.

And about not liking what we see. When I started writing a column about Sullivan a few months ago, I was e-mailed right away — even before I knew I was writing the column for certain — by some of the same Sullivan enemies who are now in the forefront of the present revelations is a conspiracy a conspiracy if everybody knows who the conspirators are? Sullivan has infuriated many colleagues. This is a turf war. Sullivan has made himself into the principal gay writer for two of the most prominent liberal publications in the nation — The New Republic and The New York Times Magazine.

Moss, who is gay — making him the most powerful gay person in journalism — has, in the eyes of other gay media people, shamed his gay identity by hiring and, they argue, protecting Sullivan.

George Christy, likewise, has, through his media position, gained outsize presence and power. Walter Matthau — would earn him dedicated enemies.

But you build up resentments over a quarter-century of lording unwarranted and unseemly power. In fact, Christy is pretty tattered and comical — but he has the power that comes from sucking up to the powerful which makes people really hate you. Attacking Christy, you could possibly believe, is an attack on Hollywood values, on Hollywood corruption in general, and even on the second-class status that Hollywood confers on journalists you get treated like a service person.

In each instance, there was a kind of sting operation. Other gay journalists contacted Sullivan through his Web personals to confirm his identity Sullivan has subsequently admitted to most of the gory details ; an ad hoc unit of the Hollywood Reporter staff got the goods on Christy.

For each of them, the problematic behavior was, in some sense, his professional stock-in-trade. He cruises. With pictures too: a fabulously muscled, thick-necked headless torso — which will make an ideal book cover when the story is told.

We may just be on the verge of understanding what an incredible kink-catcher the Web can be — a Web page becomes the misdelivered letter in a Restoration comedy. A Cartier pen? An Armani suit? Christy may be the cheapest date in motion-picture history. Okay, some of what Christy allegedly did may have been illegal. But how unusual do you think this is in an uninsured freelance town? N either scandal was a slam dunk — it took major strategizing and cunning to get both of them into print.

In the Christy case, any reporter would reasonably ask, why now? In the Sullivan case, the difficulty should have been getting anyone with a lawyer to publish such unconfirmed stuff.

Yes, Sullivan more or less confirmed it, but not until it was all over the place. Already, everybody at the New York Times knew about this because it got to gay people there.

And now that Andrew has responded, it does give more leeway to some other papers, in terms of maybe covering it from a media angle. The reporter in question was then hired by Inside. Romenesko, because all he does is link, has come to be thought of as the ultimate honest broker. Once posted here, the scandals were airborne. Of course, because we are the media and we understand both the figures in the scandal and the operation of the scandal, nobody is really shocked.

Still, the question is whether Andrew Sullivan and George Christy should be punished. And what exactly are they being punished for? They embarrass us, I suppose is the point. E-mail: michael burnrate.

Already a subscriber? Log in or link your magazine subscription. Account Profile. Sign Out. Most Viewed Stories.

And you're ensuring thru your own barebacking that it will never be like diabetes. As for how one's sexual identity has anything to do with one's public identity: they're one and the same. If they weren't poz, they'd just be called fat or skinny. Maybe I should ask him. In that case, there is no danger that sex outside the marriage — sometimes lied about, or hidden, or unspoken — can lead to indirect infection, because both men are infected already. Sullivan in August The Daily Dish.

Andrew sullivan bareback

Andrew sullivan bareback

Andrew sullivan bareback

Andrew sullivan bareback. KEEPER ITEMS

For many years, it felt like one step forward, two steps back. History is a miasma of contingency, and courage, and conviction, and chance. But some things you know deep in your heart: that all human beings are made in the image of God; that their loves and lives are equally precious; that the pursuit of happiness promised in the Declaration of Independence has no meaning if it does not include the right to marry the person you love; and has no force if it denies that fundamental human freedom to a portion of its citizens.

In the words of Hannah Arendt:. This core truth is what Justice Kennedy affirmed today, for the majority: that gay people are human. I wrote the following in Homosexuality, at its core, is about the emotional connection between two adult human beings.

And what public institution is more central—more definitive—of that connection than marriage? The denial of marriage to gay people is therefore not a minor issue. It is the entire issue. It is the most profound statement our society can make that homosexual love is simply not as good as heterosexual love; that gay lives and commitments and hopes are simply worth less.

It cuts gay people off not merely from civic respect, but from the rituals and history of their own families and friends. It erases them not merely as citizens, but as human beings.

We are not disordered or sick or defective or evil—at least no more than our fellow humans in this vale of tears. We are born into family; we love; we marry; we take care of our children; we die.

No civil institution is related to these deep human experiences more than civil marriage and the exclusion of gay people from this institution was a statement of our core inferiority not just as citizens but as human beings. It took courage to embrace this fact the way the Supreme Court did today. In that essay, I analogized to the slow end to the state bans on interracial marriage:. Slowly, white people came to look at interracial couples and see love rather than sex, stability rather than breakdown.

And black people came to see interracial couples not as a threat to their identity, but as a symbol of their humanity behind the falsifying carapace of race. It could happen again. They will seem merely like people who have been allowed to see the possibility of a larger human dignity and who cannot wait to achieve it.

In January , Sullivan blogged that he was "moving toward" the idea of "a direct American military imposition" of a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict , with NATO troops enforcing "the borders of the new states of Palestine and Israel".

He commented, "I too am sick of the Israelis. In February , Leon Wieseltier suggested in The New Republic that Sullivan, a former friend and colleague, had a "venomous hostility toward Israel and Jews" and was "either a bigot, or just moronically insensitive" toward the Jewish people.

In March , Sullivan wrote in New York magazine that while he strongly supported the right of a Jewish state to exist, he felt that Rep. Ihlan Omar's comments about the influence of the pro-Israel lobby were largely correct. Sullivan devoted a significant amount of blog space to covering the allegations of fraud and related protests after the Iranian presidential election.

Francis Wilkinson of The Week stated that Sullivan's "coverage—and that journalism term takes on new meaning here—of the uprising in Iran was nothing short of extraordinary. Sullivan was inspired by the Iranian people's reactions to the election results and used his blog as a hub of information. Because of the media blackout in Iran, Iranian Twitter accounts were a major source of information.

Writing for New York magazine, Sullivan expressed concern that high levels of immigration to the United States could drive "white anxiety" by causing white Americans to be "increasingly troubled by the pace of change" since they were never formally asked whether they wanted such a demographic shift. He has criticized Democrats for what he perceived as their unwillingness to implement such controls.

Sullivan identifies himself as a faithful Catholic while disagreeing with some aspects of the Catholic Church's doctrine. In Virtually Normal , he argues that the Bible forbids same-sex sexual activity only when it is linked to prostitution or pagan rituals. Sullivan has, however, agreed with Benedict's assertion that reason is an integral element of faith. Sullivan takes a moderate approach to religion, rejecting fundamentalism and describing himself as a "dogged defender of pluralism and secularism".

He defended religious moderates in a series of exchanges with atheist author Sam Harris in which Harris maintained that religious moderates provided cover for fundamentalists and made it impossible for anyone to effectively oppose them. In late , Sullivan began his blog, The Daily Dish. The core principle of the blog has been the style of conservatism he views as traditional. This includes fiscal conservatism , limited government, and classic libertarianism on social issues.

Sullivan opposes government involvement with respect to sexual and consensual matters between adults, such as the use of marijuana and prostitution. He believes recognition of same-sex marriage is a civil-rights issue but expressed willingness to promote it on a state-by-state legislative federalism basis, rather than trying to judicially impose the change.

Sullivan gave out yearly "awards" for various public statements, parodying those of the people the awards were named after. Throughout the year, nominees were mentioned in various blog posts. The readers of his blog chose winners at the end of each year.

In February , Sullivan moved his blog from Time to The Atlantic Monthly , where he had accepted an editorial post. In a note posted on The Dish on 28 January , Sullivan announced his decision to retire from blogging. Hodges , which legalized same-sex marriage in the United States.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Redirected from Andrew Michael Sullivan. This article is about the American writer, editor, and blogger. For other people named Andrew Sullivan, see Andrew Sullivan disambiguation. South Godstone , England , UK.

Aaron Tone m. The New York Times. Retrieved 12 April New York Press Room. Retrieved 22 December The American Conservative. Retrieved 4 December The Daily Beast. Retrieved 23 October The Atlantic. Retrieved 17 March Archived from the original on 10 October Retrieved 11 October New York Review of Books. Archived from the original on 8 July Retrieved 28 July Archived from the original on 24 June Archived from the original on 27 July The Harvard Crimson. Retrieved 25 January The Nation.

Archived from the original on 14 September Retrieved 9 March Archived from the original on 2 September Archived from the original on 30 August Archived from the original on 28 December The Washington Post. Retrieved 25 April Archived from the original on 15 September The Times. Retrieved 25 March Retrieved 25 May The Daily Dish. Retrieved 29 January Archived from the original on 26 December Retrieved 19 December Archived from the original on 10 May Retrieved 17 April Retrieved 28 January New York Magazine.

Intelligent Life. Archived from the original on 25 April Retrieved 24 October Quoted in Schaeper, Thomas J. Archived from the original on 10 February Retrieved 22 January Retrieved 1 August The Sunday Times. The Daily Banter. Retrieved 27 October White Lecture with Andrew Sullivan". Retrieved 30 June The Daily DIsh. Retrieved 13 November Free Republic.

The New Republic. Andrew Sullivan. Archived from the original on 5 March Retrieved 31 October Archived from the original on 30 January

Andrew Sullivan - Wikipedia

The chuckling audience knew what that meant. They had come to this June 7 lecture not just because of Sullivan and his topic but because of the scandal that surrounds him.

It all began in April, when Sullivan published a mocking account of his recent visit to San Francisco. Gay life in the rest of the U. Here in the belly of the beast, Village People look-alikes predominate, and sex is still central to the culture. But thanks to the outing squad, we now know that this gay moralist is guilty of the same sins he disses others for committing. Using the screen name RawMuscleGlutes, Sullivan posted on a site for bare backers the heroic term for gay men who have sex without condoms.

He was seeking partners for unsafe anal and oral intercourse. But the main mover was Michelangelo Signorile, the self-proclaimed inventor of outing. Every June some gay shock-horror grips the tabloids in time for Pride Week. We just relocate ourselves, temporarily, on the other end of the finger. He has always depended on the amnesia of his audience to cover his tracks. To support his point, he cited Martin Luther King as an advocate of armed self-defense.

This is the sort of reckless reasoning that has made Sullivan a star. His sex life is not the issue. The Times was legendary for its cold shoulder to gay activists, and its city room was considered hell on homosexual reporters. But the paper has changed dramatically. Gay men rank among its most influential staffers, and its coverage has been instrumental in the progress of gay rights.

But why this gay writer? Consider Camille Paglia, the attack dyke who graces the virtual pages of Salon. Not many people hold Matthew Shepard responsible for the torture he suffered, but Paglia has. Her pronouncement is the premise of Christian corrective therapy. Yet her throwback persona is precisely what makes her a draw. Like Sullivan, Paglia relies on gay-culture bashing to certify herself as an independent thinker.

And like Sullivan, she thrives on the sexual backlash. These gayocons stand outside the tradition of queer humanism that runs from Oscar Wilde and E. The moral core of this lineage—its compassion, its critique of power, its respect for the sexual—still informs queer culture.

It is gay liberation. But this sensibility is barely visible in the liberal media. You have to read the radical press to find the real thing. What has emerged instead reflects the uneasiness that remains about gay coverage, even as genteel acceptance has replaced active abhorrence.

No matter how secure we may feel, the fact is that gay people live in a halfway house at best. We are out on parole. The anxieties created by this uncertain status are felt by gays and straights alike. They are expressed in the Sullivan-Paglia persona.

These writers have the moral flexibility, the self-satisfaction, and the style—charm laced with cruelty—that the times demand. Why are attack queers so appealing to straight liberals? Anyone who breaks with the movement is called courageous; anyone who mocks queer mores is seen as a true individual. In reality, writers like Paglia and Sullivan are reassuring rogues, affirming the biases that straights dare not admit they hold. Revulsion at gay sexuality remains imbedded in the liberal mind.

They are as nasty as straight liberals wanna be. None of this would be an issue if the liberal media presented a full range of gay and lesbian writing. But the same system that empowers him also limits the number of queer voices in the mainstream media. On the road to freedom, every step is a transition. But before that can occur, liberals will have to examine the reasons why they take such delight in attack queers.

And easier for activists to attack the king of the mountain than to ask why the slope is so steep. Group Combined Shape. Combined Shape Group 2. Enter search below: Combined Shape.

Path 2. The City. From The Archives. Combined Shape. Rei Kawakubo: Like the Boys. Daniel Johnston at the Crossroads. His story has been a series of fuck-ups, small and tragic. The rumors why have been simple: Frank, it has been said, shot the Stones fucking groupies and shooting heroin. Fill 1. All rights reserved. Site map.

Andrew sullivan bareback