Circumcision is preferred-

Articles that met the inclusion criteria were rated for quality using the SIGN system. Database searches identified 29 publications with original data for inclusion, including 22 for aim i and 4 of these and 7 others pertaining to aim ii. In the overwhelming majority of studies, women expressed a preference for the circumcised penis. The main reasons given for this preference were better appearance, better hygiene, reduced risk of infection, and enhanced sexual activity, including vaginal intercourse, manual stimulation, and fellatio. Cultural differences in preference were evident among some of the studies examined.

Circumcision is preferred

Circumcision is preferred

Circumcision is preferred

AIDS Behav. In Islamic culture, the ritual circumcision is called khitan. Prrferred, H. In: Bolnick D. The preference for having sexual activity with Circumcision is preferred circumcised man increased during this time, from This has led evolutionary biologists to suggest that premating sexual selection resulted in evolution of the comparatively large penis of humans relative to other primates. The idea that women have a preference for circumcised male partners has a long history. ENW EndNote.

Hot ebony schoolgirl. Medical reasons for men to have a circumcision

I've only been with circumcized males, so I do not have any personal experience with an intact male. I would recommend parents Circumcision is preferred go ahead and get their male children circumcised as infants to Billets doux lingerie him the hassle of dealing with his foreskin when he grows up. The sex thing, I read the actual study and the results were variable with some saying that sex was better being circumcised. You're in! The first time I ever saw an uncut dick, Circumcision is preferred thought there was something wrong with it. The whole "who feels it better" argument is foolish as sensation is subjective. You also don't "chop off your dick". By subscribing, you agree to the terms of our Privacy Statement. There is no problem with hygiene, it is easy to clean for the male. I never expected problems- foreskin is there for a reason.

Circumcision is the surgical removal of the foreskin, which is the skin covering the tip of the penis.

  • Chat or rant, adult content, spam, insulting other members, show more.
  • I recently saw a rather volatile argument on a friends Facebook page in reguards to circumcision.
  • My results conclude that uncut men are better in the sack.
  • British Broadcasting Corporation Home.
  • .

  • .

AIDS and Behavior. Based on epidemiological, clinical and experimental evidence, male circumcision MC could have a significant impact on the HIV epidemic in selected areas. We reviewed studies of the acceptability of MC in sub-Saharan Africa to assess factors that will influence uptake of circumcision in traditionally non-circumcising populations.

Thirteen studies from nine countries were identified. Because the level of acceptability across the nine countries was quite consistent, additional acceptability studies that pose hypothetical questions to participants are unnecessary.

We recommend pilot interventions making safe circumcision services available in conjunction with current HIV prevention strategies and evaluating the safety and acceptability of circumcision. Based on the epidemiological and experimental evidence to date, MC could have a significant impact on the HIV epidemic in these most highly affected countries. However, the effectiveness of the intervention will depend on many factors, not the least of which is the extent to which MC is accepted and taken up by males in these populations.

If sufficient numbers of males are circumcised, there could be an effect similar to herd immunity since preventing men from becoming infected will also protect their sex partners. At more moderate levels of uptake, the effect is less clear.

In addition to the proportion of males who will become circumcised, the age at circumcision will also be a determinant of how rapidly the intervention results in reduction of HIV prevalence in the population.

If infant circumcision is preferred over, say, pubertal circumcision, then the time lag from introduction of a large scale intervention until observable reductions in HIV prevalence could be decades. Because acceptance of MC by men and by parents of males in traditionally non-circumcising communities will be crucial to the success of a MC intervention for reducing HIV prevalence, we provide a review of the extant literature on acceptability of MC in sub-Saharan Africa.

Locations by level 3 administrative unit where male circumcision MC acceptability studies were conducted. Residents of Nyanza Province, age 16—80, men and women, 30 focus groups, each 6—14 people, urban and rural population, farmers, business people, teachers, sex workers, barmaids, and touts. All studies employed some variation of a convenience sample. All the studies were conducted in areas where circumcision is not traditionally practiced.

Levels of male circumcision MC acceptability from eight quantitative studies in six sub-Saharan African countries. Circumcision preference and conditions for acceptability reported in eight studies from six sub-Saharan African countries.

In general, approximately the same proportion of women would prefer circumcision for their partners or their sons as men would prefer circumcision for themselves or their sons. In Botswana, Kenya, South Africa and Swaziland, where men or women were asked about circumcision for their sons, more adults would agree to the procedure for their child than for their spouse or themselves. Participants belonging to non-circumcising ethnic groups were familiar with the circumcision practices in neighboring circumcising tribes where pain was a key characteristic of the procedure.

As a rite of passage to becoming a man, the endurance of the pain from circumcision is often an integral aspect of the ceremony.

For example, of circumcised participants in South Africa, Lack of circumcision was mentioned as an element of the ethnic identity of those who do not circumcise traditionally. It serves as an ethnic marker primarily used by others. It is fundamentally different from belonging to an ethnic group that does practice traditional circumcision.

In some ethnic groups in which circumcision is not commonly practiced, disapproval of circumcision is evident in the existence of a derogatory term for a circumcised man or a man with a congenitally shortened prepuce. Religion is a major determinant of circumcision acceptability. MC is universally associated with Islam.

It is also considered fundamental to some minority Christian and animist sects. Rain-Taljaard and colleagues report the South African belief that circumcision is fundamentally an African tradition and that Western ideas concerning the practice should not be taken seriously. However, it was unclear whether this opposition was directed at circumcision itself or at rites and ceremonies with which it was associated. Before MC is promoted in a country, it would be prudent to consult and collaborate with religious leaders to learn the stance of the various churches regarding MC.

In many cases, churches can act as helpful advocates or obstructive opponents and may have significant influence on acceptability of MC. Traditional circumcision is often expensive due to the costs of food, drink, special clothing and other items required during a sometimes prolonged celebration. If men and parents believe that circumcision leads to high rates of complications, then uptake of MC is likely to be slow.

Concerns for safety were universal in the studies examined. Mothers were vocal in their concerns, especially in cases of infant and early childhood circumcision. Overall, there seemed to be a great deal of trust in medical practitioners and a strong preference for circumcision services to be made available in public health facilities by trained health professionals. In focus groups in Kenya, Malawi and Zambia a concern about the possibility of behavioral disinhibition was inevitably expressed.

There is some evidence of behavioral disinhibition among circumcised men. In addition to reporting more extramarital partners in the previous year 1.

The majority of participants, including women, believed that it was worrisome that men do not maintain proper hygiene. It was belief about sexual pleasure that was the strongest predictor of being willing to undergo circumcision. How circumcision is perceived to influence sexual drive, sexual performance, and sexual pleasure for the man himself or for his partner is likely to influence decision making around MC. Most studies assessed three factors associated with sexual activity based on circumcision status: sexual performance, sexual pleasure for men, and sexual pleasure for women.

Many had no preference. The ages at which males become circumcised will have an effect on how rapidly MC interventions may impact the HIV epidemic in any given area. Preferred age at circumcision varied both between and within studies. Among the nine countries where acceptability studies have been undertaken, only in Botswana were most participants in favor of circumcision in infancy and early childhood.

Many people from traditionally non-circumcising communities felt that they had insufficient knowledge to make a decision about when best to circumcise.

Practitioners interviewed in Kenya and Malawi preferred not to perform neonatal circumcision due to the small size of the penis and foreskin, potentially leading to higher rates of errors and complications. In areas where traditional circumcision is uncommon, the preference is overwhelmingly for a medical practitioner to be the provider. The influence of women on the decision to circumcise is likely to be highly variable across cultures and across families within communities.

However, in many settings, women, as mothers and as partners, are likely to have considerable influence, even if it is not overt. Any effort to promote MC will be more successful if it appeals to women as well as men. Two out of thirteen studies assessed acceptability of MC among adolescents.

As in most areas, adolescent boys linked circumcision with modernity and good hygiene. In Kenya, younger men were more likely to accept circumcision. Results from more qualitative studies entailing focus group discussions were consistent with these quantitative results. Asking people whether they might prefer to be circumcised under various hypothetical scenarios e. A more realistic means is to discover where MC services are available and see who takes advantage of the services.

Alternatively, one can offer the services in non-circumcising communities and see the response. This approach permits assessment of not just numbers seeking the services, but also the ages and population segments that respond as well as factors that inhibit or facilitate uptake of the services.

In a comparison district, where no intervention was available, just 24 circumcisions were preformed over the same period. Demand for MC services was judged to be high but was highly dependent on cost. The results from this trial intervention are consistent with results from studies of hypothetical acceptability indicating that cost is consistently found to be a major barrier to uptake of circumcision in traditionally non-circumcising communities. However, that all but 5. Of these, 4, Gray, personal communication.

That such large numbers of men are willing to join these trials suggests that circumcision acceptability is high and that uptake of MC in these communities could be rapid, if sufficient resources are available to accommodate large numbers of procedures. Through searching electronic databases and contacting authors, we identified 13 studies from nine countries that include investigation of the acceptability of MC in traditionally non-circumcising regions in sub-Saharan Africa.

We found one additional report of a pilot intervention introducing MC services into health facilities where circumcision was little practiced. The level of acceptability across the nine countries appears greater than might be expected, considering that all thirteen communities where the studies were performed were all traditionally non-circumcising.

More than half of men in the regions studied appear to be receptive, if not eager, to become circumcised. Cost, fear of pain, and concern for safety were the three most consistent barriers to acceptability of MC.

In communities where circumcision is the norm families expect to incur the obligatory circumcision expenses negating the importance of cost. In non-circumcising communities circumcision is regarded as a voluntary procedure that may be unlikely to take precedence over competing needs. Cost is viewed as including not only the payment for the procedure, but also the opportunity costs of time away from work and other income generating activities. These results indicate that the true cost of the procedure will have to be supplemented to achieve significant uptake of MC.

The concerns for safety and pain are based partially on the perception of circumcision as a surgical procedure with inherent risks and partially on the occasional press releases publicizing mutilations and deaths.

Personal knowledge of neighboring communities where traditional initiates withstand excruciating pain also likely plays a role. Sustained uptake of MC will require performance of the procedure with minimal adverse events. The studies we reviewed revealed that it is virtually universal that Africans equate circumcision with improved hygiene. Also widespread is the belief that circumcision leads to reduced incidence of STIs achieved through improved hygiene, reduction in the number and severity of scratches, tears and abrasions to which the foreskin is susceptible and through earlier detection of ulcers, leading to earlier treatment.

Although not as frequent, a significant proportion of participants in the studies also saw circumcision leading to reduced risk of HIV acquisition through the same route. Cultural norms, ethnic identity, and religious affiliation were viewed as central factors in acceptability of circumcision. Circumcision was associated with specific traditionally circumcising communities and with Muslims and members of a few minority Christian and animist sects.

It will likely be important that confidentiality is maintained by circumcision practitioners, since stigmatization for being circumcised is a possibility in non-circumcising communities.

Urbanization, ethnic mixing, and exposure to other cultures and religions are conducive to higher acceptability of circumcision in traditionally non-circumcising ethnic groups.

In East and Southern Africa most MCs are done between ages 8 and 21 and the preferences for age at circumcision found in studies are consistent with these practices. However, a large enough proportion of people, especially mothers, preferred infant circumcision to consider making infant circumcision an available option. This should be an important consideration in designing MC interventions.

Information campaigns may be effective in increasing acceptability of MC. However, many studies demonstrated that both knowledge and acceptability of MC varies considerably by region within the same country.

Therefore, informational campaigns may be more effective if targeted to particular communities. Just as the international health community is concerned about the possibility that promotion of circumcision could lead to increases in risky sexual behavior World Health Organization, , participants in many of the studies reviewed were similarly concerned.

This underlines the importance of the counseling and education that must be provided to men who undergo circumcision, reinforcing the idea of MC reducing, not eliminating, the risk of HIV and other STIs.

I love it. Search term:. I'd also like to know how standard biology taught globally is opinion. Yes it is quite different. My results conclude that uncut men are better in the sack.

Circumcision is preferred

Circumcision is preferred. Report Abuse

The preferred age is often seven although some Muslims are circumcised as early as the seventh day after birth and as late as puberty. There is no equivalent of a Jewish 'mohel' in Islam. Circumcisions are usually carried out in a clinic or hospital. The circumciser is not required to be a Muslim but he must be medically trained. In some Islamic countries circumcision is performed after Muslim boys have recited the whole of the Qur'an from start to finish.

In Malaysia, for example, the operation is a puberty rite that separates the boy from childhood and introduces him to adulthood. Circumcision is not compulsory in Islam but it is an important ritual aimed at improving cleanliness. It is strongly encouraged but not enforced. The ritual dates back to the time of the Prophet Muhammad. According to tradition Muhammad was born without a foreskin aposthetic.

Some Muslims who practise circumcision see it as a way of being like him. Therefore, all Muslims - devouts, liberals or seculars - observe this ritual. Muslim are obliged to follow not only Allah's message in the Holy Qur'an but also what the Prophet said or did, as proof of their dedication to Islam.

Traditionally, adult converts to Islam were encouraged to undergo the operation but this practice is not universally endorsed, particularly if the procedure poses a health risk. Search term:. Read more. This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets CSS enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience.

Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets CSS if you are able to do so. This page has been archived and is no longer updated. Find out more about page archiving. Circumcision of boys Last updated On this page Find out more Page options Print this page. Now because the surface of the glans is exposed, the nerves will soon be numb due to the fact that they go through continuous friction throughout their daily lives which probably causes them to lose a huuuuuggeee chunk of nerves.

Now if you were to have protective sex with condoms, the poor gent has basically got nothing to feel on. Circumcision is therefore wrong because: It's a mutilation of one's body which is already illegal Serves no true definite purpose for supposed 'protection' Eliminates sexual gratification. Circumcision is fucked up. The foreskin is naturally there, people are born with it which means that it is needed, it's supposed to be there.

Who the fuck decided that getting rid of it would be a good idea? If I ever have a son, there's no way I'm gonna get him mutilated, I don't care what the father may or may not want. As for my future partners, obviously it's not gonna be a deal breaker if he's circumcised, more than likely it wasn't his fault, but I'd strongly prefer an uncircumcised dude. Originally, men wanted their son's foreskin off to prevent masturbation during the 19th century which obviously did not work at all and through trend of "my son's penis should like mine", circumcision then became popular in america.

Modern circumcision may also include reasons for being 'hygienic' and all that bull crap. Or rather give you an uncircumcised cockie as it seems more appropriate for the context: farm4. I am very much against routine male infant circumcision. There are rare instances when it's a medically necessary procedure and might in those cases have to be done in childhood. But I don't think the partial amputation of a boy's penis should be anyone's decision but his -- when he's grown older and decide for himself.

The foreskin tissue has thousands of nerve endings and helps keep the head of the penis from drying out. I think circumcision is pretty fucked up, even though I am circumcised. In the right mind, I would never circumcise my own children If I ever have any. Circumcision is genital mutilation. It was done to stop boys from masturbating, and obviously that didn't work. Chances are your husband wanted his son to be the same to not make himself feel inferior by losing part of his bodily function and integrity.

Furthermore most european health-organisation are strictly against it, because the benefits are questionable while the risks any surgery has a risk are beyond that. Not to mention that boys have the very same right to bodily integrity and choosing themselevs as girls - or at least should have. What about my body my choice? Does that not count for boys? Phimosis is easily treatable in most cases without surgery. While the American organisations are pro-circumcision probably because there is a lobby earning millions from the stem-cells , pretty much all european health organisations claim the risk for such a surgery never outshine the number of still questionable benefits.

The handful of studies about decreased STDs are still questioned as they aren't the most scientific 5. As much kids die on the procedure usually by infection than kids who will later have issues with phimosis. Worth it? Circumcision is one of the procedures with the biggest numbers of errors and negative aftereffects skin-bridging, etc 7. Underneath the foreskin - just like inside the vagina - there is its own bacterial benefical fauna 8. Every intact penis is easily cleanable by simply pulling the foreskin back.

And frankly - you dont want to be with a guy who is incapable of properly cleaning himself no matter if cut or uncut. There is not a single country out there who does female genital mutilation but not male circumcision.

It is comparable with removing the clitoral hood. You want your clitoral hood removed because it might be a bit cleaner despite all the risks? Then why do you want to justify it done to guys?

Definitely role-model nations we got there. Infants can't be properly anaesthetised so they will have to endure most of the pain on one of the most sensitive body-parts. See here: edition. That's a really important topic. I wish it was talked about more often and more openly in real life. It's true that arguments often get heated, but that doesn't help in the end.

I believe that everyone has to reach their own conclusions about it. The facts are all there. The rest is beliefs. Tequilarosebud Thank you. Would be cool to talk about it if you like. I believe that it is a decision that should be made by the parents after being properly educated on the FATS of the matter not in somebody's decisions and beliefs. I do believe from the few men I have spoken with that it is more painful to be done as an adult than as a baby.

As I said I didn't want to have it done to my son as I felt it was unnecessary but his father as a male wanted it done and seeing as how I am a male and do not have a penis I figured there were reasons that my husband wanted it done other than the fact he wanted it to look the same that maybe I wouldn't or couldn't understand being a female.

I don't believe at all that it is mutilating a child by having this done as most men that do have it done have a perfectly happy sex life and really have no problems with being circumcised. I feel like people that get on here making asshole comments are merely unable to understand that people have different opinions and believe that their opinion is the only right one. I'm not happy about that being done to me but am not going to throw rocks at people for difference of opinions. Use a damn shower if you don't want infections.

If your husband was missing an arm, would he also insist that your son gets his arms cut off? Literally the dumbest argument. Also if the guy wants to get his penis circumcised for whatever reason when he's old enough to understand what it's about, then he's free to do as he wishes.

It's insanely selfish of parents to force their babies through this unnecessary and brutal procedure, without consent unless, as I said, it's done for legitimate medical reasons and not for any of the poor reasons I stated in the very beginning of this post. I'm definitely against circumcision. Any surgery that is done for cosmetic reasons and not for necessary ones is not a surgery I am going to condone on my child, especially not when my child is a baby and has literally no understanding of what is happening to them.

Circumcision is not necessarily a bad thing, for many people it's good for their health and some people prefer it purely on an aestheitc level which I also don't prefer and if my child decided to get circumcised as an adult, then I'd have no problem with it.

But it's not something I'm going to force on my kid when, in my opinion, it's unnecessary mutilation. Medically there is no difference between infection rates of a circumcised penis and an uncircumcised one. Both should be washed the same, and so will have the same rate of infection. I have been told that an uncircumcised penis is more sensitive than a circumcised one, as the hood actually protects the tip from rubbing, therefore stopping it from desensitizing.

Much like if you keep one eye shut and the other open while looking into a light, the eye that was kept shut would see better in the dark than the one kept open as the eye looking into the light desensitized from the light, letting less in. The circumcised penis is much like the open eye, it feels less sensation.

There is no explicit benefit to circumcising a boy. The origin of circumcision was to keep boys from masturbating, eventually the tradition turned into 'his should look like mine'. Imagine if the belief that burning the clitoral hood off a woman to stop her from masturbating had taken off, what people would be saying about that. I'm not judging, I just don't agree with the practice. You said no mean comments, but I really feel it is actually just to be said.

Having your son circumcised because his father wanted him to 'look like him', is actually one of the most idiotic things I have ever heard. With regard to everything else. It's not even a debate. It's wholly unnecessary. The only subjective aspect is it apparently looks better aesthetically.

Personally I think circumcised cocks even look daft. Trying to watch American porn stars attempt to get some life out of their weird shaped cocks is always amusing. I suspect Americans are comparatively 'riddled', funnily enough. A cursory google seems to suggest that might be the case. I hope you can forgive me, and at least accept in some sense this response is righteous. I'm the opposite.

An uncircumcised dick looks like the face of an elephant seal ha ha. I battle to watch those in porn. But I actually agree with you, although I am very pro-circumcision, getting it done to look like daddy is not really the best reason to do it.

Yeah the circumcision debate can get heated. I'm circumcised and my bro isn't. I am so happy that I got circumcised and want my kids to be circumcised. My brother has had a few problems. Not major but things that can be avoided. The sex thing, I read the actual study and the results were variable with some saying that sex was better being circumcised. You have not felt sex with your penis unmutilated. Why are you jumping to conclusions to questions which need experiment and results from both sides?

QooLipBite they did do it from both sides dumbass lol the experiment was conducted with adult males who chose circumcision. Fact is the results were mixed. Some said sex got worse, others said it got better, the majority were meh. The consensus is that sex may be slightly better for some who are not circumcised.

It's negligible. Lol and I wonder if you see the irony when you say "jump to conclusions". There have been wayyy more studies conducted, not just the one you read and chose to believe that had different outcomes.

It's theoretically a proven fact it's simply logic that if you get your foreskin cut off, you lose a wholel bundle of nerve endings. Added to that, because the sensitive part that was protected by the foreskin has lost it's protective layer, the nerves become desensitized due to continuous friction of the exposed surface.

Be happy. Whether or not my first statement was correct or not, my conclusion is still the same, sex is NOT better when you chop off your dick. QooLipBite I highly doubt it. You also don't "chop off your dick". You keep showing your "dumbassness".

Bottom line, me and the rest of the circumcised dudes who luuurv fucking are laughing at you and your unintelligence. It's unwise to believe the conclusion and analysis of a fool. QooLipBite you brought nothing more than stupidity to the table. It's too late to justify yourself. Please just stop lol. Even guys who are pro non - circumcision are face palming.

What are you even saying? Logically with reason, circumcision removes and kills off nerve cells which in turn would lead to less receptive feeling aka less pleasure. The reason foreskin is there is to protect the penis itself from its environment.

And being honest here, your response to QooLipBite is pretty stupid and very childish for a "33" year old man. Now, I don't see how circumcision would give more pleasure because that just goes against all known facts.

Jeffrey a the removal of many things, like tonsils, wisdom teeth, gall bladder, pancreas etc will objectively take something away but doesn't necessarily effect the system.

Actual studies prove mixed results in terms of sexual sensation. The opinion of a 15yr old vs scientific studies? Then even if it does take some sensation away, it shows a slight decrease. Then even if there is a slight decrease, some people still prefer being cut as gobsmacked illustrated in this thread shows you the problems that the foreskin can give then you put yourself into a corner by stating "that just goes against all facts" even though you clearly have not seen the facts and omitted everything that was said based on your Opinion?

Bit contradictory. B regarding qoolipbite , whether I call him a dumbass or "that person who failed to bring a logical argument to the table due to his clear lack of understanding in the subject matter, science, research and argument", it still is what it is In the context of this question. I mean a guy who believes that circumcision is based on cutting ones penis off, then trying to save himself by saying that it was there to provoke me, then clearly illustrating that he didn't read my answer or doesn't understand science , showing severe cognitive bias, and who also doesn't wait for my reply to jump to the conclusion that I've been "schooled" is just below what anyone would define as "clever", therefore putting him into the "dumbass" category.

Circumcision is the surgical removal of the foreskin, which is the skin covering the tip of the penis.

The procedure is typically done on a newborn for personal or religious reasons. Circumcision in older children and adults may also be done for the same reasons. Additionally, older children or adults may need circumcision to treat several conditions, including:.

In healthy newborns, there is no medical need for circumcision. However, families may choose to have their sons circumcised for a number of reasons. One of the most common reasons is religious tradition. The religious laws of both Judaism and Islam require that newborn boys be circumcised.

Other reasons to circumcise include:. In Judaism, the ritual circumcision is called a brit milah and is typically performed as part of a religious ceremony at home or in a synagogue, although it is sometimes performed in a hospital.

It is performed by a mohel, who has received religious and surgical training to perform ritual circumcision. The procedure is almost always done when the baby boy is eight days old.

In Islamic culture, the ritual circumcision is called khitan. In some parts of the Islamic world, the procedure is performed as part of a religious ceremony. In most Islamic countries, the khitan is performed in infancy, but it may be done when a boy enters puberty. There are health-related reasons to circumcise newborn males. Circumcision is a decision best left to parents or to the child himself when he is older.

Doctors can help parents better understand the benefits and risks. Some found no effect, while others found increased sensitivity. Circumcision is often done while newborns are still in the hospital. Different practitioners are trained to perform circumcision in newborns, including pediatricians and obstetricians.

For older children and adults, the procedure is usually performed in a hospital or surgery center on an outpatient basis. This means that you would go home on the same day. Proper consent is also needed.

Circumcisions are often done by a pediatrician, obstetrician, family medicine doctor, surgeon, or urologist. Circumcisions that are performed for religious reasons are sometimes done by others trained in the procedure. During the newborn circumcision, your son will lay on his back with his arms and legs secured. An anesthetic is given via injection or cream to numb the penis.

There are several techniques for performing circumcision. The three major methods of circumcision are the Gomco clamp , the Plastibell device , and the Mogen clamp. Each one works by cutting off circulation to the foreskin to prevent bleeding when the doctor cuts the foreskin. The procedure takes about 15 to 30 minutes. After the procedure, your baby may be fussy. The doctor or nurse will provide instructions for how to decrease any discomfort.

You can wash the penis and change the dressings with each diaper change. Keep the diaper slightly loose to help the tip of the penis heal. Your doctor will give you specific instructions on how to care for your incision and lessen your pain.

In general, you should return to work and daily activities when you feel comfortable. Avoid strenuous exercise, such as jogging or weight lifting, for the first four weeks of your recovery or until your doctor gives their approval. Walking is the best way to exercise during your recovery. Try to walk a little more than you usually do each day. You should also typically avoid sexual activity for six weeks after the procedure. Follow the instructions from your doctor about sexual activity.

The different circumcision options affect how much of the foreskin is left and how "loose" or freely it can move on the shaft of the penis.

Newborns tend to sleep a lot. Some babies sleep for 16 to 18 hours each day, waking up only for short breaks to eat and have a diaper change.

Here are some life hacks to make your life a little easier. As a single parent, you take care of everything from the family budget to medical emergencies. By using a chart called The Wonder Weeks, parents can prepare for fussy periods. Looking for a laugh, parents? Check out these funny tweets about parenting from top bloggers.

First solid foods offer a great opportunity to get your baby used to a variety of flavors. This could make them more willing to try new things…. Get inspired—and a few laughs—from these moms who are ruling our television sets. Motherhood is wonderful. But it can also be hard and lonely — and sometimes really scary.

Check out these top parenting books for advice on communication, positive parenting, and raising a happy family. Pros and cons Preparation Procedure Follow-up What is circumcision? Pros and cons of circumcision. How to prepare for a circumcision. How a circumcision is performed. Follow-up and recovery.

Other Methods. Read this next. Loose Circumcision Style vs.

Circumcision is preferred

Circumcision is preferred

Circumcision is preferred