Would you recommand me the or the The ash-poplar lasy core with carbon reinforcements mean less chatter and more speed. I would imagine it could handle the crud better, but how would you compare the fun-factor, snappy and playful attributes between these 2 boards? I'm 61, 5'10', lbs. Advanced intermediate. Hi Renee! I'm 5. Am comfortable on Shoguns and have managed Patrons. Both are going to feel more stable than your K2. I really can take them anywhere and they maneuver quite well
Rossignol mogul ski naked lady. Sound off in the comments below!
Try out the Nordica enforcer series. Skis from Beginner to Expert level can skk found in this category. Take your place on the podium. Back for more of the same park, pipe, urban, and on hill freestyle dominance; The Tom Wallisch Pro Model skis are designed by Rossignol mogul ski naked lady for the world's best freestyle skier, Tom Wallisch. I see amazing park skiers who cant even make it down a mogul field. Rossignol is using cookies in order to offer the best service. Hot off the last year's production line, the Fischer Lunar hits the market this year with modified cosmetics. Close Save. I love them completely. Gives up a bit in harder snow compared to the Brahma but more fun in softer snow and more of a freestyle feel.
It is a long standing rule that you do not mess with perfection.
- Bump skis take a pounding.
- Search by Brand
- Search by Brand
- Welcome to the Newschoolers forums!
If you haven't read our M5 Mantra review we'd recommend going back to reference that article, as we won't dive quite as deep into the new construction these two skis share in this article. Let's start here by touching on construction quickly, because it is important. Instead of two full sheets of metal as we've seen in a lot of their skis thus far, the top layer of metal in the secret is broken into horseshoe shaped laminates that sit along the edges of the ski, wrap around the tip and tail, but do not connect underfoot.
There is also a carbon inlay in the tip of the ski to help strengthen the ski a little bit and reduce any chatter or movement from the front of the ski. This is all surrounding Volkl's Multi-Layer Woodcore. The shape of the ski differs slightly from the new Mantra. The Secret is narrower than the Mantra, coming in at 92 mm underfoot. It makes sense considering the ski is available in shorter lengths than the Mantra.
Using a narrower waist in shorter lengths retains a similar feel across the two different genders. Aside from the width difference everything else is pretty much the same. It uses tip and tail rocker with camber underfoot, but the rocker isn't too extreme. It's relatively low rise rocker that's designed to provide the maneuverability benefits, but still retain good edge contact and thus good edge grip through aggressive turns.
The Volkl Secret uses the same complex core construction as the new Mantra M5, which you can see depicted above. While the M5 Mantra was designed to replace the previous version of the Mantra reverse camber, underfoot , it's harder to say the Secret is replacing the Aura. The Aura is gone from the Volkl lineup, yes, but at 92 mm underfoot and with camber back in the ski the Secret is a pretty significant change. It is, however, carrying over the Volkl heritage of being a high performance, high-end ski.
That day when we tested some of the Volkl skis back in January was one of the best days of the season at Stowe. That gave us really nice conditions and terrain for testing and, like the Mantra, we're quite impressed by this new Secret. Our resident Volkl-loving female, Alli, spent a lot of time on the Secret on that day and has skied it quite a bit since then as well.
She pretty much fell in love with the ski right away and was often heard asking if she had to give it back. On groomers she described them as a great carving ski. Like the Mantra the Secret really has a nice sweet spot.
Alli has spent time on both the Aura and the Kenja and she compared the Secret to both. With the bigger sweet spot and the ability to get the ski to really flex underfoot the Secret feels more approachable and a little more forgiving than both those skis, and especially the Aura.
We talked about it quite a bit in the Mantra review, but the reverse camber shape with two sheets of metal in the Aura required some pretty specific technique to get the most of it. The Secret is far easier to ski, carves way better than the Aura, but is still maneuverable in soft snow even though it's 8 mm narrower. It might not have quite the same vibration damping as the Kenja and Aura, but it's really, really close.
It's important to note that there's still quite a bit of metal in the Secret with a full sheet along the base and then the Titanal Frame on top. The feel does change, but there's still plenty of stability, power, etc. In softer snow conditions, which we had a lot of on that day back in January, it's a blast.
Sure, it's not the widest ski out there, but it handles the 12 inches of fresh snow we had that day really well. It might not have the same float as the Aura, but again it's got a bitter sweet spot and a more balanced feel, which gives it a great feel in softer snow. In fact, even though it was pretty deep, Alli never mentioned that she wished she was on a wider ski. Sure, there will be days when the snow is deeper or heavier when you would probably want a wider, more rockered ski, but the Secret performs impressively well in soft snow despite its 92 mm waist width.
To compare it to the Kenja it's much more user friendly in un-groomed snow conditions and off-piste terrain, but it does still have that solid Volkl feel. We again invite you to take a look at our M5 Mantra review if you'd like to learn more about this new ski design and its performance. Because the construction is the same across both skis and because their performance is largely the same we thought we'd keep this article a little shorter. Don't hesitate to leave any comments or questions below if you'd like to learn more about the Secret or want us to compare it to other skis from Volkl or from any other manufacturer.
Much more metal in the Secret, so I think it's safe to say it's a little bit "more ski. Both are exceptionally versatile all mountain skis, but they do have a different feel. Looking to replace a Kenja, heard the new Kenjas got softer tails. Love the Kenya, but it's a little old and I would like a tiny bit more than 85 underfoot.
Would that be the Secret one to do it? I do have some S7 for Pow days and ski trees a lot What other skis should I consider? I'm curious what length Alli was on? I tried them in Mt. I'm an intermediate skier. The rep thought if I got the s I'd grow out of them. I think either the new Secret or the newest version of the Kenja could work for you.
The Kenja actually feels a little stiffer than the Secret. You can hear Alli talking about that in the beginning of the video. So, if you're looking for a stiff tail the Kenja might be the way to go over the Secret. The Secret is a lot of fun, however, and still performs at a high level for sure. It just feels a little softer flexing right under foot. Still rips, just a slightly different feel than the Kenja. There aren't actually many women's all mountain skis that can match the Kenja in terms of pure power and overall stiffness.
There's quite a bit more metal in the Titanal Frame construction found in the Secret compared to the Titanal Band in the Yumi. The Secret has a full sheet of metal along the base and then those horseshoe-shaped metal laminates along the top.
The Yumi just uses a single strip down the center of the ski. The Yumi is definitely lighter and a little quicker edge to edge just due to the narrower waist width. A little bit softer flex overall too, and a bit more approachable for a more intermediate-level skier compared to the Secret. Alli was skiing the cm length, although she is a little bit bigger than you. Not much, but a little bit. I don't necessarily think you'd grow out of the cm length at your size and at the intermediate level.
That certainly isn't an unreasonable length for someone your size. The cm is actually a little taller than you, or at least even with your height, which is often the cutoff to where skis start feeling a little bit overwhelming. Looking to replace cm Aura from 3 years ago,expert skier 5' 1" lbs. Considering sizing up give the narrower waist width, but like the shorter length for tree skiing. What's you opinion, does the Secret ski "shorter" than the old Aura?
I'm currently skiing on Volkl Aurora , which I love. Thinking about the Secret. How do they compare? I'm 5'7. No, in our testing they don't ski any shorter than the Aura. They are a little lighter, but with the camber underfoot in a lot of conditions you're getting a longer effective edge.
I don't think you need to size up at your height and weight from that cm length. The Secret is wider than your Auroras. Do you remember what year they are from? The Secret is more of an all mountain ski, while the Aurora was narrower, full camber, and focused more on carving on firm snow.
You get a lot more versatility out of the Secret for sure. Better in softer snow conditions, easier to pivot and smear turns because of the tip and tail rocker, and they still do really, really well on groomers too. Definitely just an overall improvement from your Auroras.
I am ski shopping for my wife. Age Advanced intermediate, 5' 1" pounds. Likely a ski length. She doesn't really go particularly fast but likes options for eastern skiing.
Likes frontside with some good pow moments and wants to cover periodic skiing out west we do a lot of Stowe and Tremblant skiing with odd trip to Blackcomb etc. But as an eastern skier in reality that ability to maintain some edge control in icier conditions is crucial too. I have a pair of Blizzard Rustler 9's which are just great. This newer concept of less metal, but some nonetheless, seems to have a lot going for it. The Secret and the Sheeva 9 seem to be attempting to check the same tick boxes.
She's not in her twenty's anymore so less effort is appreciated. So here comes the hard question for you Seems like a toss up.
Nice to see someone still rides moguls these days. They flex and rebound hundreds of times a day, sometimes in a single run. Check out the Volkl Kendo. Search by Brand One Ski Quiver Skis.
Rossignol mogul ski naked lady. Mogul Skis: The Bump Busters
Junior Skis. Ski Bindings. Ski Accessories. Gift Certificates. Slightly narrower at the tip and tail than the version, this F17 Fusion is super responsive in the bumps and light weight in the air. Slightly narrower at the tip and tail, this F17 Fusion is super responsive in the bumps and light weight in the air. Just like the adult Fusion, the Fusion Team is produced in Japan. These skis are hand made and feature the best quality construction in the industry.
The Hart Boss Mogul Skis were designed and created for bumpers who prefer a lighter, narrower, more symmetrically shaped mogul ski that doesn't sacrifice performance and edge control for a reduction in the ski's weight. The Hart F17 Fusion, skied by Olympic, World Cup Medalists, is a world class mogul ski with a long pedigree of success over the years!
The Hart F17 World Cup ski has been created for an even more mogul specific ski for the accomplished mogul skier. The K2 Poacher is one of the best all mountain freestyle skis on the scene. The Poacher is athlete developed, tested, and designed to poach any feature or stash that you see first. The K2 Mogul Skis are the new mogul skis from K2, sort of. The K2 Mogul Skis have an all new paint job and new published lengths, but this ski is the same as the perennial favorite, K2 Mamba.
Back for more of the same park, pipe, urban, and on hill freestyle dominance; The Tom Wallisch Pro Model skis are designed by and for the world's best freestyle skier, Tom Wallisch.
The Tom Pro does not disappoint! Slightly narrower at the tip and tail than the version, this F17 Fusion is super responsive in the bumps and light weight in the air. Slightly narrower at the tip and tail, this F17 Fusion is super responsive in the bumps and light weight in the air. Just like the adult Fusion, the Fusion Team is produced in Japan.
These skis are hand made and feature the best quality construction in the industry. The Hart Boss Mogul Skis were designed and created for bumpers who prefer a lighter, narrower, more symmetrically shaped mogul ski that doesn't sacrifice performance and edge control for a reduction in the ski's weight.
The Hart F17 Fusion, skied by Olympic, World Cup Medalists, is a world class mogul ski with a long pedigree of success over the years! The K2 Missconduct has been the women's go to freestyle all-mountain ski for many seasons now. The Missconduct is a reliable friend. The girls love the MissConduct because it's so versatile, one minute you can be playin' in the park the next minute your carving the frontside. Our test girls were stunned at how reponsive the Honey Bee was, especially when we told them the HB's price tag.
The Rossignol Hero Mogul Skis are a brand new ski for Rossignol and are made for the best junior level mogul skiers out there. Mogul skis are getting harder adn harder to come by so do not wait on these they will be gone fast.
This is a race stock ski and built for the strongest of mogul skiers. You may recognize this ski as being on the podium at the Winter Olympics.
Skinny Is the New All Mountain Ski | POWDER Magazine
Versatile, maneuverable, effortless, light. But in my first four days on this ski, the Soul 7 exhibited no quirky behavior, and no surprises or hinge points in its flex pattern. It feels really well designed, in that its individual parts camber profile, shape, flex pattern, rocker lines, splay, etc.
A lot of skiers across a wide range of ability levels are going to have a lot of fun on this ski this season. But one of the most impressive things about the S3 was how broad of a range of skiers it could serve, from beginners to experts, and the same is true of the Soul 7. As you can see in the rocker profile photos on the last page of this review, the Soul 7 has a good bit of camber underfoot, and the ski exhibited good edge hold and carved well when conditions were the least bit soft.
In fresh snow, I could drive the shovels quite hard, or ski from a more neutral, centered position. The Soul 7 accommodated either style. In beautiful, open sections of wind-deposited, light powder at Craigieburn, the Soul 7 was a ton of fun, and was happy to make quick, short turns, happy to make very fast, big turns, happy to run bases flat, happy to make high angulation turns.
They just did whatever I wanted them to do, and it was extremely intuitive and easy. I was never fighting the ski. The skis tracked well, yet it was extremely easy to break the tails loose whenever I wanted.
I could slash hard and scrub a lot of speed in an instant, or subtly feather the tails out to make any turn shape I wished. The reduced weight in the tips were great for slicing and dicing mogul sections.
For the reasons just listed, the Soul 7 is going to be a good tree ski. In deeper, cut up snow, the Soul 7 requires a pretty light touch. The faster I was skiing soft chop, the more I would take a bases-flat approach to deal with the conditions. Great initial review Jonathan. Was trying to sell myself on getting a Deathwish as it to is receiving tons of positive feedback. Just feel a bit centered mounted for my directional style. You made a comment about rider weight that may favor folks less than lbs.
Thanks for all the hard work you put into providing a solid source for consumers to hone in on products that suite their needs. Thanks, Kiley! With virtually any lighter weight, medium flex ski, the heavier a skier is, the more likely it is that they will overwhelm the ski, feel like the ski is too much of a noodle. I would imagine it could handle the crud better, but how would you compare the fun-factor, snappy and playful attributes between these 2 boards?
Kiley, I spent a bit of time on the Soul 7 in NZ look for the second look, coming soon and I skied the Deathwish all last winter in Vermont.
Despite being reasonably stiff for its weight, it will get bounced around in choppier or harder conditions. Getting it on edge is very easy. Great review. I demoed this and had a similar impression. Awesome, surfy, turny in fresh pow, not so great with crud at speed. Surprised to see they could rail at modest speeds on groomers.
Even able to navigate bumps, although not at great speed or a tight line. I like to bulldoze through crud, bounce off bumps at speed, and carve really fast GS turns on groomers.
Opted for a Dynastar 94 for all that instead. I am very tempted to buy this ski as a touring ski because it is so much fun in deep pow through tight trees.
I already have 4 sets of skis and if I get 5 I think I would get divorced. I know the Soul 7 has tip and tail rocker with camber while the Sickle is a full camber ski but are they comparable skis? Would the Soul 7 be a good replacement for the Sickles? Thanks, Ian! And I think the answer is: Probably.
The rocker profile and the tip shape of the Sickle is probably better suited than the Soul 7 to that type of skiing. Seems like they would be great due to their light weight, quickness, and maneuverability.
Hey, mb — Soul 7 vs. The Soul 7 has less splay in the tip, but is a fatter ski. So which will be better in powder? Probably the Soul 7, but not by a huge margin. So which will be the better carver? And in chop, neither is going to shine, but hard to say which will clearly do better. Also, these skis weigh about the same, and have nearly the same sidecut radius.
Good stuff, thanks. Interesting you mentioned the rocker, looking at the pics, the rocker looks pretty minimal even when ignoring the camber.
I guess there is some good early rise in the front, and a little in the tail. Does it feel like it has a big rocker when you ski on them? I have had trouble with big tail rocker in the past—makes it very difficult to recover from one bad backseat turn. Prob a reflection of my poor form. I never felt that the Soul 7s tail was unsupportive — and like you, I hate that feeling.
The Soul 7s tail is good, not too tapered, not too much rocker. Thanks again for all the helpful feedback. As a side note, I think they look pretty ugly or maybe a better word is dorky in person.
But the specs are ideal and the reviews have been great. Hey MB, how did you end up liking these as a tele setup? The are super quick and light, yet plenty stable, and they worked great in the bumps, steeps, and trees. I think the best thing I can say about them is they are extremely intuative—despite being longer and signficiantly wider than my previous hand-me-down skis, it took approximately one turn on each side before I was comfortable with them.
And that comfort leads to confidence and better sking. But I will enjoy them while they last. I was on the Cochise cm last year, loved it but was wanting a ski with camber, smaller sidecut radius, and nimbleness at slower speeds so went with the Soul 7 cm for this year.
Was thinking I would replace the Cochise with the Soul 7, but from the review seems like they might complement each other. Seems that people build quivers based on waist widths, but not in this case. Any thoughts on this? Hey, Vince — I think there could be perfectly good reasons to go with a quiver of two skis of a similar width. In any case, let us know how it works out for you!
I am willing to buy this ski for telemark. I am 5,7 and lbs. Would you recommand me the or the But it might be helpful to check out my answer to mb above. Let us know how it goes. I have skied the Soul 7 cm through the Australian season, which came late and ended early.
I got to ride them in dry boot deep powder, chalky refrozen snow, warm slop, occasional ice patches, soft bumps and groomers. Fantastic ski in all these conditions, surprising for its width. Nice rebound, tracks well on hard stuff. Looking forward to skiing trees in Japan next January on the Souls.
Jason — see my reply to Ian above. As I speculated above, I will bet that the biggest performance difference will be in crud, where the tip and tail shape of the Sickle will likely make it more at home in those conditions than the Soul 7.
Hey great review! I am stuck between choosing either the Soul 7 or the 4frnt Hoji as a devoted backcountry touring ski. I am wondering which ski is better for; turns in the trees, hitting cliffs, some open powder skiing, touring, and playfulness.
Just wondering which one you would choose?? But I also experienced pretty significant tip dive in deep powder in Niseko — to a degree that I doubt I would have on the Soul 7. Great Info Jonathan! I like skiing the groomers but am always looking to head off through the trees and take the route less traveled when I can.
I enjoy skiing fast, taking long sweeping turns as well. Any wisdom you can throw my way is much appreciated. Yeah, Jason, if speed is really important to you, and groomers are important to you … I think you might want more ski than the Soul 7, and the Experience 98 is one of my favorite groomer skis ever. No speed limit. Totally impressive. Thanks for the reply, Jonathan! While most of the terrain I frequent is groomed runs, I look for powder when I can.
From the sound of things, the Blizzard Cochise seems to maybe fit that bill.